RTP by casino
A slot studio publishes one or more RTP versions and each casino picks one. UKGC rules require casinos to make information on the chances of winning available, such as the RTP, and some casinos print it on their public game pages. We read those pages and compare each figure with the versions the studio publishes.
In one line27 casino figures for 26 slots: 3 match the studio’s top RTP version, 3 are one of its lower versions, 17 are not among the versions we have on file and 4 are for games whose studio publishes no RTP list to compare with. Each is what a UK-licensed casino states on its own game page, dated and archived.
Updated Casino-stated figures, UKGC-licensed casinos only
27
Casino figures shown
26
Slots
3
At a lower studio version
2
UK casinos
Every casino figure
| Slot | Casino | RTP the casino states | Studio versions | Studio version match | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Bass BonanzaPragmatic Play | MrQ | 94.02% | 96.71% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/big-bass-bonanza |
| Big Bass SplashPragmatic Play | MrQ | 94.6% | 96.71% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/big-bass-splash |
| Chaos CrewHacksaw Gaming | MrQ | 96.3% | 96.3% / 92.4% / 88.4% | Matches top version | mrq.com/slots-and-games/chaos-crew |
| Chaos Crew 2Hacksaw Gaming | MrQ | 96.35% | 96.27% / 94.22% / 92.41% / 88.28% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/chaos-crew-2 |
| Deadwood xNudgeNolimit City | MrQ | 94.15% | 96.03% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/deadwood |
| Fire In The HoleNolimit City | MrQ | 94.11% | 96.06% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/fire-in-the-hole |
| Fruit PartyPragmatic Play | MrQ | 96.47% | 96.5% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/fruit-party |
| Gates of OlympusPragmatic Play | MrQ | 94.5% | 96.5% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/gates-of-olympus |
| Great Rhino MegawaysPragmatic Play | MrQ | 94.69% | 96.5% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/great-rhino-megaways |
| Iron BankRelax Gaming | MrQ | 96.2% | None published | No studio list to compare | mrq.com/slots-and-games/iron-bank |
| Le BanditHacksaw Gaming | MrQ | 94.23% | 96.34% / 94.23% / 92.17% / 88.36% | Lower version | mrq.com/slots-and-games/le-bandit |
| Madame Destiny MegawaysPragmatic Play | MrQ | 94.63% | 96.56% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/madame-destiny-megaways |
| MentalNolimit City | MrQ | 94.08% | 96.08% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/mental |
| Misery MiningNolimit City | MrQ | 96% | 96.09% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/misery-mining |
| Money Train 2Relax Gaming | MrQ | 96.4% | None published | No studio list to compare | mrq.com/slots-and-games/money-train-2 |
| Money Train 3Relax Gaming | MrQ | 96.5% | None published | No studio list to compare | mrq.com/slots-and-games/money-train-3 |
| Money Train 4Relax Gaming | MrQ | 96.1% | None published | No studio list to compare | mrq.com/slots-and-games/money-train-4 |
| RIP CityHacksaw Gaming | MrQ | 96.22% | 96.22% / 94.27% / 92.32% / 88.02% | Matches top version | mrq.com/slots-and-games/rip-city |
| San Quentin xWaysNolimit City | MrQ | 94.11% | 96.03% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/san-quentin |
| Starlight PrincessPragmatic Play | MrQ | 96.5% | 96.5% | Matches top version | mrq.com/slots-and-games/starlight-princess |
| Sugar RushPragmatic Play | MrQ | 94.5% | 96.5% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/sugar-rush |
| Sweet BonanzaPragmatic Play | MrQ | 95.5% | 96.48% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/sweet-bonanza |
| The Dog HousePragmatic Play | MrQ | 95.51% | 96.51% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/the-dog-house |
| Wanted Dead or a WildHacksaw Gaming | MrQ | 94.55% | 96.38% / 94.55% / 92.33% / 88.42% | Lower version | mrq.com/slots-and-games/wanted-dead-or-a-wild |
| Wanted Dead or a WildHacksaw Gaming | PlayOJO | 92.33% | 96.38% / 94.55% / 92.33% / 88.42% | Lower version | playojo.com/slots/wanted-dead-or-a-wild |
| Wild West GoldPragmatic Play | MrQ | 94.53% | 96.51% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/wild-west-gold |
| Wolf GoldPragmatic Play | MrQ | 93.99% | 96.01% | Not among the versions we have on file | mrq.com/slots-and-games/wolf-gold |
Matches top version: the casino’s figure is the studio’s highest published version. Lower version: it is one of the studio’s lower published versions. Not among the versions we have on file: the figure is not in the list of the studio’s versions we hold. No studio list to compare: the studio publishes no RTP list for the game, so there is nothing to compare the figure with. Studios supply RTP versions to casinos that are not always made public, so this on its own is not a sign of a problem. Sorted by slot name, not by RTP. The page checked is printed as text; we do not link to casinos.
18+. UK help: GamCare (gamcare.org.uk, 0808 8020 133) and BeGambleAware (begambleaware.org).
Which UK casinos publish per-game RTP
- LeoVegas UK. No per-game RTP on its game pages when checked (October 15, 2026).
- MrQ · UKGC account 60629. Its game pages state a per-game RTP (checked Oct 15, 2026). 26 figures from its UK game pages are shown on this page.
- PlayOJO · UKGC account 39326. Its game pages state a per-game RTP (checked Oct 15, 2026). 1 figure from its UK game pages is shown on this page.
- Spin Genie · UKGC account 39326. Its game pages state a per-game RTP (checked Oct 15, 2026).
UKGC rules require casinos to make information on the chances of winning available, such as the RTP; a casino that prints no RTP on its game pages usually shows it in the game itself, in the rules or info screen.
We only list UK-licensed casinos’ own published figures. Casinos not named here are not covered yet. Figures from offshore casinos and from demo builds are collected for research but never shown.
How we check
- Source. The casino’s own public game page, read logged out, the way any visitor sees it. We do not register, deposit or log in; our regular checks run from a server outside the UK, without proxies, and never get round a bot check. On 15 October 2026 we read PlayOJO’s and Spin Genie’s game pages once through a UK home internet connection, so we saw the pages UK visitors are served; those figures carry that date. We honour robots.txt and wait at least three seconds between requests to the same site.
- Licence. Each run checks the casino’s account on the UK Gambling Commission public register (an active remote casino licence with the domain listed), and the page the figure came from must carry that same UKGC licence statement. When a casino serves us a page under another licence, its figures are not shown.
- The figure. We record the RTP the page prints, with the date and time, and the text it appeared in, normalised to plain text (markup and spacing removed; where the page only shows an RTP field, the field label and value), which the CSV gives as the figure as printed (normalised), and keep an archived copy of the page (its SHA-256 is in the CSV). A figure that is not among the studio versions we have on file is held for a manual check before it is shown, and a figure that changes is shown only after two identical readings in a row.
- What it means. The RTP shown is the casino’s own statement. UKGC rules require casinos to make information on the chances of winning available, such as the RTP (the Gambling Commission’s technical standard RTS 3C). A statement on a marketing page is not a reading of the game server, and the casino can change the version it runs at any time: check the game’s rules or info screen before you play.
- Freshness. Checks older than 45 days are marked “older check”; after 90 days a figure is removed until it is checked again.
- Wording. We report what the page stated on the day we checked. A lower version is a setting the studio offers and the casino is allowed to choose; it is not a sign that a game is unfair. Studios supply RTP versions to casinos under their own agreements and do not always publish every version, so a figure that is not among the versions we have on file does not mean the casino runs an unofficial game.
Licences: MrQ, UKGC account 60629 (Tek Fox Ltd) (UKGC register ↗); PlayOJO, UKGC account 39326 (Skill On Net Limited) (UKGC register ↗).
For the versions studios publish, see the Slot RTP Report 2026 and what counts as a good RTP.
Right of reply
If you run a casino listed here and a figure is wrong, out of date or taken from the wrong page, tell us through our right-of-reply form with the game and the page. We re-check the page, update or remove the row, and log any correction on our corrections page.
Download the data
Download every casino figure (CSV): one row per casino and slot, with the licence, the RTP stated, the studio’s versions, the match, the check date, the page checked, the figure as printed (normalised) and the SHA-256 of our archived copy.
Cite this dataset
RTP Direct News. “Slot RTP stated by UK casinos.” Dataset, updated October 15, 2026. https://rtpdirectnews.com/rtp-by-casino (accessed October 15, 2026)